Generative Expert System

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly large language models (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These include chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image synthetic intelligence image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu in addition to many smaller firms have actually established generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes across a wide variety of industries, consisting of software development, healthcare, financing, entertainment, client service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] style, [18] and item style. [19] However, issues have actually been raised about the potential abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, making use of phony news or deepfakes to deceive or manipulate people, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Copyright law issues likewise exist around generative designs that are trained on and imitate copyrighted works of art. [22]

Early history

Since its inception, researchers in the field have actually raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the consequences of producing artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these concerns have formerly been checked out by myth, fiction and philosophy because antiquity. [23] The concept of automated art go back at least to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where developers such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having actually created machines capable of writing text, creating sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of imaginative automations has actually thrived throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s robot created in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been utilized to design natural languages given that their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his very first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the novel Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is discovered on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic artificial intelligence

The scholastic discipline of expert system was developed at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced a number of waves of improvement and optimism in the decades because. [31] Artificial Intelligence research study began in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have utilized synthetic intelligence to create creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and exhibiting generative AI works produced by AARON, the computer system program Cohen created to produce paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI planning or generative preparation were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to describe AI planning systems, specifically computer-aided procedure preparation, used to generate series of actions to reach a specified goal. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems used symbolic AI approaches such as state space search and restraint complete satisfaction and were a “fairly fully grown” technology by the early 1990s. They were used to create crisis action prepare for military use, [35] process plans for manufacturing [33] and decision plans such as in prototype autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural webs (2014-2019)

Since its creation, the field of machine learning used both discriminative designs and generative models, to model and forecast data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep learning drove development and research study in image classification, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this period were typically trained as discriminative models, due to the problem of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, improvements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the first useful deep neural networks capable of finding out generative models, instead of discriminative ones, for complicated data such as images. These deep generative designs were the first to output not only class labels for images however also whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network allowed developments in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] leading to the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), called GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which showed the capability to generalize unsupervised to various tasks as a Foundation model. [40]

The brand-new generative designs presented during this period enabled big neural networks to be trained utilizing without supervision learning or semi-supervised learning, instead of the monitored knowing common of discriminative designs. Unsupervised learning got rid of the requirement for people to manually label data, enabling larger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, developed by a confidential MIT researcher, was a free web application that might produce persuading character voices using minimal training data. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content creation, affecting subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which even more democratized access to top quality expert system art development from natural language prompts. [46] These systems showed unprecedented abilities in producing photorealistic images, art work, and develops based on text descriptions, causing extensive adoption amongst artists, designers, and the general public.

In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT transformed the ease of access and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to take part in natural conversations, produce innovative content, help with coding, and carry out various analytical tasks captured global attention and sparked widespread conversation about AI’s prospective effect on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI abilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “might reasonably be deemed an early (yet still incomplete) variation of an artificial basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this assessment was contested by other scholars who kept that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the benchmark of ‘basic human intelligence'” since 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta released ImageBind, an AI model integrating multiple methods consisting of text, images, video, thermal data, 3D data, audio, and motion, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI design offered in 4 versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and announced strategies for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google unified Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, launching a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 household of large language models, consisting of Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The models demonstrated substantial enhancements in capabilities throughout numerous standards, with Claude 3 Opus especially surpassing leading models from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which demonstrated enhanced efficiency compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in areas such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has actually become a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants using the innovation, going beyond both the international average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is further evidenced by China’s intellectual residential or commercial property advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly exceeding the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by using not being watched artificial intelligence (invoking for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised maker discovering trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend on the technique or kind of the data set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For example, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language designs). They are capable of natural language processing, maker translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as foundation models for other tasks. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, big language designs can be trained on programs language text, enabling them to generate source code for brand-new computer system programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing high-quality visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Artificial intelligence art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are frequently utilized for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which demonstrated the capability to clone character voices using just 15 seconds of training information. [67] The site gained prevalent attention for its capability to create emotionally meaningful speech for numerous imaginary characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives subsequently emerged, including ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can also be trained on the audio waveforms of documented music along with text annotations, in order to create new musical samples based upon text descriptions such as a calming violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been created, like the tune Savages, which utilized AI to imitate rap artist Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t safeguarded from regenerative AI yet, raising a dispute about whether artists must get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have been developed that can be generated utilizing a text phrase, category choices, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, comprehensive and photorealistic video clips. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can likewise be trained on the movements of a robotic system to generate brand-new trajectories for movement preparation or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research utilizes triggers like “get blue bowl” or “clean plate with yellow sponge” to control motions of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” models such as Google’s RT-2 can perform primary thinking in action to user prompts and visual input, such as choosing up a toy dinosaur when provided the timely pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other things. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided design (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might also be established utilizing connected open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to assist simplify workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are used to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, shows tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image products such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have been integrated into a range of existing commercially offered items such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are also offered as open-source software, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language model.

Smaller generative AI designs with approximately a couple of billion specifications can work on smartphones, embedded gadgets, and computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion parameters) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with tens of billions of criteria can run on laptop or desktop. To attain an appropriate speed, designs of this size might need accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon items. For instance, the 65 billion criterion version of LLaMA can be set up to work on a desktop PC. [91]

The advantages of running generative AI in your area include protection of personal privacy and intellectual property, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular concentrates on utilizing consumer-grade video gaming graphics cards [92] through such methods as compression. That forum is one of only two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language model benchmarks. [93] Yann LeCun has advocated open-source designs for their value to vertical applications [94] and for enhancing AI safety. [95]

Language designs with hundreds of billions of criteria, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, generally work on datacenter computers geared up with selections of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These extremely big designs are usually accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced restrictions on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to meet the requirements of the sanctions.

There is free software application on the market capable of acknowledging text created by generative synthetic intelligence (such as GPTZero), as well as images, audio or video coming from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for detecting generative AI material include digital watermarking, material authentication, details retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both free and paid AI text detectors have actually frequently produced false positives, mistakenly accusing students of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and policy

In the United States, a group of business including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to need all US business to report details to the federal government when training particular high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Expert system Act includes requirements to divulge copyrighted material utilized to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China controls any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark generated images or videos, regulations on training information and label quality, restrictions on personal information collection, and a standard that generative AI should “comply with socialist core worths”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, openly readily available datasets that include copyrighted works. AI designers have argued that such training is protected under fair usage, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of reasonable usage training have argued that it is a transformative use and does not include making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can produce nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs take on the content they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, a number of suits connected to using copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has taken legal action against Stability AI over the use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have actually taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over using their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated content

A separate question is whether AI-generated works can receive copyright security. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works produced by expert system without any human input can not be copyrighted, since they lack human authorship. [116] However, the office has actually likewise begun taking public input to identify if these rules require to be improved for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The advancement of generative AI has actually raised concerns from governments, organizations, and people, resulting in demonstrations, legal actions, calls to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by multiple federal governments. In a July 2023 instruction of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned “Generative AI has enormous potential for good and evil at scale”, that AI may “turbocharge worldwide development” and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the global economy by 2030, however that its harmful usage “might cause horrific levels of death and damage, extensive injury, and deep psychological damage on an inconceivable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have actually been arguments put forward by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computers actually ought to be done by them, given the difference between computers and humans, and in between quantitative computations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually resulted in 70% of the jobs for video game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor conflicts. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “expert system poses an existential risk to imaginative occupations” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has actually been seen as a possible obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The intersection of AI and employment issues among underrepresented groups worldwide stays an important facet. While AI guarantees efficiency enhancements and ability acquisition, concerns about job displacement and prejudiced recruiting procedures continue among these groups, as laid out in surveys by Fast Company. To take advantage of AI for a more equitable society, proactive steps incorporate mitigating predispositions, promoting transparency, respecting privacy and approval, and embracing diverse groups and ethical factors to consider. Strategies include rerouting policy focus on regulation, inclusive style, and education’s capacity for individualized teaching to take full advantage of benefits while decreasing damages. [126]

Racial and gender predisposition

Generative AI designs can show and magnify any cultural bias present in the underlying information. For example, a language design might assume that doctors and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases prevail in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image model triggered with the text “a picture of a CEO” may disproportionately create pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially prejudiced data set. A number of techniques for reducing bias have been tried, such as changing input triggers [129] and reweighting training data. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “fake” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and replace them with somebody else’s similarity utilizing synthetic neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually amassed widespread attention and issues for their uses in deepfake celeb pornographic videos, revenge pornography, fake news, scams, health disinformation, financial scams, and hidden foreign election disturbance. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited actions from both industry and government to detect and restrict their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically discovered that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as pictures of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim females supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (dispersed ledger technology) to promote “openness, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and use”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software to create controversial statements in the vocal style of celebrities, public authorities, and other famous people have raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In reaction, companies such as ElevenLabs have stated that they would work on mitigating potential abuse through safeguards and identity confirmation. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually generated from AI-generated music. The very same software application used to clone voices has actually been utilized on popular musicians’ voices to produce tunes that mimic their voices, getting both remarkable appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar techniques have likewise been used to create improved quality or full-length versions of tunes that have been dripped or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has actually likewise been utilized to create brand-new digital artist characters, with some of these receiving sufficient attention to receive record offers at major labels. [156] The designers of these virtual artists have actually likewise faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, including backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and also developing artists which develop impractical or immoral interest their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s ability to produce practical fake material has been made use of in many types of cybercrime, consisting of phishing frauds. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been utilized to develop disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click fraud czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that when deepfake videos end up being completely sensible, they would stop appearing amazing to audiences, possibly causing uncritical approval of incorrect details. [159] Additionally, big language models and other kinds of text-generation AI have been used to develop phony evaluations of e-commerce sites to improve scores. [160] Cybercriminals have actually developed big language models focused on fraud, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study revealed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, enabling assailants to get aid with harmful requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have demonstrated that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their safety limitations at low expense. [163]

Reliance on market giants

Training frontier AI models requires a huge quantity of computing power. Usually only Big Tech business have the monetary resources to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up purchasing access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and reporters have actually expressed concerns about the ecological impact that the development and release of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] big quantities of freshwater utilized for data centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electrical power usage. [170] [166] [171] There is also concern that these effects may increase as these designs are integrated into widely used online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as models require to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation methods consist of factoring prospective environmental expenses prior to design advancement or data collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of data centers to minimize electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] developing more effective machine finding out models, [168] [166] [169] decreasing the number of times that models need to be re-trained, [167] establishing a government-directed framework for auditing the environmental effect of these designs, [168] [167] regulating for openness of these designs, [167] regulating their energy and water use, [168] encouraging scientists to release information on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject specialists who understand both artificial intelligence and climate science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times defines slop as analogous to spam: “substandard or undesirable A.I. material in social media, art, books and … in search results.” [172] Journalists have actually expressed concerns about the scale of low-quality created material with respect to social networks material small amounts, [173] the financial rewards from social media companies to spread out such content, [173] [174] false political messaging, [174] spamming of scientific term paper submissions, [175] increased time and effort to find greater quality or preferred material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of produced material by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a photo of web pages, were device equated. Much of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, specifically for sentences that were equated throughout at least three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, revealed that she had actually stopped updating the data for several factors: high costs for acquiring information from Reddit and Twitter, extreme concentrate on generative AI compared to other approaches in the natural language processing neighborhood, and that “generative AI has contaminated the information”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools resulted in an explosion of AI-generated content throughout several domains. A research study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely composed with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of freshly released computer system science papers and 16.9% of peer review text now incorporate content created by LLMs. [183]

Visual content follows a comparable trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that approximately 34 million images have been created daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had actually been created using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by models based on Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated material is consisted of in new information crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI models, problems in the resulting designs may happen. [185] Training an AI design exclusively on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality model. Repeating this process, where each new design is trained on the previous design’s output, results in progressive degradation and ultimately results in a “model collapse” after multiple iterations. [186] Tests have actually been performed with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with photos of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the worth of data gathered from authentic human interactions with systems might end up being progressively important in the presence of LLM-generated content in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, synthetic information is frequently used as an alternative to information produced by real-world occasions. Such data can be deployed to validate mathematical models and to train device learning designs while maintaining user personal privacy, [188] consisting of for structured information. [189] The technique is not limited to text generation; image generation has been utilized to train computer vision models. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been utilizing an undisclosed internal AI tool to write at least 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a phony AI-generated interview with former racing driver Michael Schumacher, who had actually not made any public appearances given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing mishap. The story included 2 possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line “stealthily genuine”, and the interview consisted of an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired shortly afterwards amidst the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have actually published short articles whose material and/or byline have actually been verified or presumed to be produced by generative AI designs – typically with false material, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – include:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually utilized generative AI to produce short articles for much of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to show that they “had produced tens of thousands of short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually presented news with anchors based upon Generative AI designs, triggering concerns about job losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has actually traditionally been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material developers or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically generated anchors have actually likewise been utilized by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google supposedly pitched a tool to news outlets that declared to “produce news stories” based upon input data provided, such as “information of present occasions”. Some news company executives who saw the pitch described it as” [taking] for approved the effort that entered into producing precise and artistic news stories.” [224]

In February 2024, Google introduced a program to pay small publishers to compose three posts daily utilizing a beta generative AI design. The program does not require the knowledge or permission of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it require the published posts to be identified as being created or assisted by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually gone through cybersquatting, with articles produced by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed issue that generative AI could have a harmful effect on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to fund local news outlets for exploring with generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI business developing a dependence for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which summarizes news stories, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly further reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In reaction to potential mistakes around the use and misuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about declining audience trust, outlets around the globe, including publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually published guidelines around how they prepare to use and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uncomfortable with news produced by “primarily AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “primarily human with some help from AI”. The results of worldwide studies reported that individuals were more unpleasant with news subjects consisting of politics (46%), criminal activity (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]

Computer programs portal

Technology website

Artificial general intelligence – Type of AI with extensive capabilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Expert system art – Visual media produced with AI
Artificial life – Field of research study
Chatbot – Program that mimics conversation
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Kind of large language design
Large language model – Kind of artificial intelligence model
Music and synthetic intelligence – Usage of expert system to produce music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit product produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is developed algorithmically as opposed to by hand
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of details retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in artificial intelligence

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, companies, and governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, retrieved January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse just yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood writers’ battle against AI, people win (in the meantime)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the effect of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the initial on January 13, 2018, obtained October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Artificial Intelligence. New York, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Short History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer aided process planning: the modern survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). A Self-governing Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a standard generative AI planner based upon the HSTS planning framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control part is a standard spacecraft mindset control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also include an architectural element clearly committed to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and monitoring.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine learning: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “An Extensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language models are unsupervised multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language understanding with without supervision knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some form given that ’15. ai’ released in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E produces plausible pictures of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace humans?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that integrates 6 kinds of data”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google introduces Gemini-an effective AI model it says can surpass GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic unveils Claude 3, surpassing GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a fast brand-new AI model – and a creative brand-new way to interact with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Be Alive.'”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the chances and dangers of foundation models”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Purchasing Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please keep in mind that only English voices are available.; Another major feature of 15. ai is its abundant emotional expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it utilized 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 “top quality” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers described in a paper the ethical obstacles that they came across around the advancement of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer triggers dispute over AI rights”. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies through text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the initial on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Expert System (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design build times with brand-new AI-driven part development approach|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by design”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches more detailed as startup Runway reveals new design”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is primary. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft adds OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative synthetic intelligence innovations such as the popular ChatGPT talking app to its Microsoft 365 suite of company software … the brand-new A.I. functions, called Copilot, will be readily available in some of the company’s most popular service apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature just got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting an upgraded, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll be able to use generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative synthetic intelligence (AI) will become one of the most crucial features for innovative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and usage Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot today”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you desire to run LLaMA 2 on your own device or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can develop a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are created locally, so you don’t need a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model in your home, you will require a computer construct with a powerful GPU that can manage the large quantity of information and computation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I quite much only trust 2 LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * safety and security” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to halt sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while complying with stringent U.S. export standards that restrict just how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 totally free software application to recognise fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We evaluated a brand-new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent trainee”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be impossible. That’s a huge issue for instructors”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI content for safety, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first guideline on artificial intelligence”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers elect harder AI guidelines as draft relocate to last stage”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI rules to apply just to products for the public”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo huge Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s also welcoming the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Starting”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wants to hear what people think of AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Taking a Stand on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking computer game illustrators’ tasks in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art industry reportedly decimated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of sophisticated tech”. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring a contract that clearly demands AI guidelines to protect authors and the works they create. … The future of generative synthetic intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to replace labor-has become a crucial sticking point for actors going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more typically referred to as SAG-AFTRA), stated that ‘synthetic intelligence poses an existential risk to innovative occupations, and all actors and performers are worthy of contract language that safeguards them from having their identity and talent made use of without consent and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools introduce out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in nations around the world are worried about AI being a risk to jobs”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are biased. Can logic assist in saving them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing predisposition and enhancing safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No quick repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 highlighted the challenges of predisposition in AI“. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying modern porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face switching tech could start a global face-off”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the initial on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to boost anti-U.S. impact campaigns, authorities say”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus fake news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the challenges of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of synthetic intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software application race has actually begun”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at risk from AI-driven disinformation, say specialists”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to take on deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users embrace AI voice clone tool to generate celebrity hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake star audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI tunes that imitate popular artists raising alarms in the music market”. ABC News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record deal with AI pop star”. New York Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Get ready for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘fraud czar’ predicts the most significant danger is that deepfakes will ultimately end up being uninteresting”. Business Insider. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake evaluations: can we trust what we read online as usage of AI blows up?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI designs open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it indicates for climate change”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of expert system”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological expenses are soaring – and mostly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Are Out of Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer system researcher explains the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop'”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design suddenly tries to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The most recent wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has actually always been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, “it was manageable and often recognizable. Large language designs generate text that masquerades as genuine language with intent behind it, although there is none, and their output crops up everywhere,” she composed. She offers the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “delve,” in a manner that individuals do not, which has tossed off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the frequency of LLMs in the academic literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively produced information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Hazard to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Artificial Intelligence”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating a Synthetic Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found errors in more than half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A magazine promoted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was in fact AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ utilizing AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports composing program”. Axios. Archived from the initial on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today website. Did these writers exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioning “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian local news stories a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Move to AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Concerning your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, Along With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI post about females’s usage of fake tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a fixture in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, whatever – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for standard publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A national network of local news websites is releasing AI-written posts under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming reporter captured utilizing artificial intelligence to develop phony quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated articles, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are penetrating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple says it will upgrade AI function after inaccurate news informs”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are using AI-generated presenters to read the news. The concern is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor revealed in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Cherished Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech blog writers are surprised to discover their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already attacking Oregon’s local journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators caution AI might lead to ‘destruction’ of local news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta strolled away from news. Now the company’s utilizing it for AI content”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s approach to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.